1) Why choose intrinsic safety?

The topics on this page include:

return to index page
PDF of this page

1.1) Introduction

Intrinsic safety is a low energy technique that prevents explosions by ensuring that the energy transferred to a hazardous area is well below the energy required to initiate an explosion. The two mechanisms considered are initiation of an explosion by a spark or by a hot surface.

The useable energy level available is small, but is more than adequate for the majority of instrumentation systems.

Return to top

1.2) The advantages of intrinsic safety

The major advantage of intrinsic safety is that it provides a solution to all the problems of hazardous areas (for equipment requiring limited power) and is the only technique, which meets this criterion. The significant factors are as follows:

  1. The technique of intrinsic safety is accepted throughout the world. There is an increasing acceptance of international certificates issued under the IEC Ex scheme but this has some way to go. Intrinsic safety is an acceptable technique in all local legislation such as the ATEX Directives and OSHA. The relevant standards and code of practice give detailed guidance on the design and use of intrinsically safe equipment to a level which is not achieved by any of the other methods of protection.
  2. The same equipment usually satisfies both the dust and gas hazard requirements.
  3. Appropriate intrinsically safe apparatus can be used in all Zones. In particular, it is the only solution for Zone 0 instrumentation that has a satisfactory history of safety. The use of levels of protection (‘ia’, ’ib’ and ’ic’) ensure that equipment suitable for each level of risk is available (normally ‘ia’ is used in Zone 0, ‘ib’ in Zone 1 and ‘ic’ in Zone 2).
  4. Usually intrinsically safe apparatus and systems are allocated a group IIC gas classification which ensures that the equipment is compatible with all gas/air mixtures. Occasionally IIB systems are used, as this permits a higher power level to be used. (However, IIB systems are not compatible with acetylene, hydrogen and carbon disulfide.)
  5. A temperature classification of T4 (135°C) is normally achieved, which satisfies the requirement for all industrial gases except carbon disulfide (CS2) which, fortunately, is rarely used.
  6. Frequently apparatus, and the system in which it is used can be made ‘ia IIC T4’ at an acceptable cost. This removes concerns about area classification, gas grouping and temperature classification in almost all circumstances and becomes the universal safe solution.
  7. The ‘simple apparatus’ concept allows many simple pieces of apparatus, such as switches thermocouples, RTDs and junction boxes to be used in intrinsically safe systems without the necessity of certification. This gives a significant amount of flexibility in the choice of these ancillaries.
  8. The intrinsic safety technique is the only technique, which permits live maintenance within the hazardous area without the need to obtain ‘gas clearance’ certificates. This is particularly important for instrumentation, since faultfinding on de-energised equipment is difficult.
  9. The installation and maintenance requirements for intrinsically safe apparatus are well documented, and consistent regardless of level of protection. This reduces the amount of training required and decreases the possibility of dangerous mistakes.
  10. Intrinsic safety permits the use of conventional instrumentation cables thus reducing costs. Cable capacitance and inductance is often perceived as a problem, but this is only a problem on cables longer than 400m needed in systems installed in Zones 0 and 1 where IIC gases (hydrogen) are the source of risk. This is comparatively rare and, in most circumstances, cable parameters are not a problem.

Return to top

1.3) Available power

Intrinsic safety is fundamentally a low energy technique and consequently the voltage, current and power available is restricted. Figure 1.1 is a simplified illustration of the available power in intrinsically safe circuits and attempts to demonstrate the type of electrical installation in which the intrinsically safe technique is applicable.

The blue and green curves are the accepted design curves used to avoid spark ignition by resistance-limited circuits in Group IIC and IIB gases. The ‘ic’ curves are less sensitive because they do not require the application of a safety factor in the same way as for ‘ia’ and ‘ib’ equipment. In general the maximum voltage available is set by cable capacitance (400 metres corresponds to 80nF which has a permissible voltage of 29V in ‘IIC ia’ circuits) and the maximum current by cable inductance (400metres corresponds to 400µH which has a permissible current of 300 mA in IIC ia circuits). A frequently used limitation on power is 1.3W, which easily permits a T4 (135°C) temperature classification. These limits are all shown in Figure 1.1.

A simple approach is to say that if the apparatus can be operated from a source of power whose output parameters are within the (blue) hatched area then it can readily be made intrinsically safe to ‘ IIC ia T4’ standards. If the parameters exceed these limits to a limited degree then it can probably be made intrinsically safe to IIB or ‘ic’ requirements.

The first choice, however, is always to choose’ IIC ia T4’ equipment, if it provides adequate power and is an economic choice, as this equipment can be used in all circumstances (except if carbon disulfide [CS2] is the hazardous gas, in which case there are other problems).

In practice almost all low voltage instrumentation can be made’ IIB ic T4’ as the limits are set by the least sensitive of the ignition curves in Figure 1 (typically 24V 500mA).

The ‘IIB ic’ specification does restrict application to Zone 2 and where the hazardous gas is not hydrogen, acetylene or carbon disulfide but is still applicable to a large range of installations.

Return to top

Click image for greater detail

curves graph

Figure 1.1

1.4) Conclusion

Intrinsic safety is the natural choice for all low voltage instrumentation problems. Adequate solutions exist which are compatible with all gases and area classifications. The technique prevents explosions rather than retains them which must be preferable, and the ‘live maintenance’ facility enables conventional instrument practice to be used.

Return to top